×

AMH is an independent media house free from political ties or outside influence. We have four newspapers: The Zimbabwe Independent, a business weekly published every Friday, The Standard, a weekly published every Sunday, and Southern and NewsDay, our daily newspapers. Each has an online edition.

  • Marketing
  • Digital Marketing Manager: tmutambara@alphamedia.co.zw
  • Tel: (04) 771722/3
  • Online Advertising
  • Digital@alphamedia.co.zw
  • Web Development
  • jmanyenyere@alphamedia.co.zw

Impact-driven behaviour at the leadership level

When leadership models impact-driven behaviour, teams gain the leeway to focus on outcomes that matter

LEADERS set the tone — not through mission statements or town hall meetings, but through their daily decisions and visible trade-offs.  

Impact-driven behaviour at the leadership level is emerging as a defining feature of successful, resilient and socially relevant organisations in the 21st century.  

When leadership models impact-driven behaviour, teams gain the leeway to focus on outcomes that matter.  

When they do not, even the best strategies degrade into mere activity, short-term wins or the chasing and gaming of metrics. 

The million-dollar question for business leaders is: “What behaviours are you modelling, and toward what impact?”  

Impact-driven leadership does not only ask, “Is this profitable?” but also, “Who does it affect, and how?” 

This mindset recognises that decisions made at the top ripple outward, shaping employee well-being and customer trust. 

Impact is learned by observation. 

Employees study leadership behaviours very closely.  

They quickly notice what gets prioritised when resources are limited, how leadership responds to bad news, and which results are celebrated.  

Observation is a skill that is often underrated.  

It involves watching processes, behaviour and outcomes to gain knowledge that data alone cannot provide.  

Observation reveals how tasks are actually performed, including hidden difficulties and informal solutions that might not appear in documented reports.  

When leaders observe interactions, they can evaluate team dynamics, employee engagement, and leadership effectiveness — all of which directly impact organisational culture and morale.  

Observation becomes even more powerful when combined with data sources such as reports, which provide essential background.  

By integrating data with real-world context, observers can uncover relevant and meaningful insights. 

The cost of inconsistent signals — Most organisations can articulate a clear purpose, yet often make the shift to measuring and rewarding behaviours that undermine it.  

It is well known that inconsistency reduces trust, discouraging customers from making repeat purchases.  

Similarly, inconsistent branding makes marketing efforts inefficient and erodes brand equity.  

Another downside is that a lack of standardised processes leads to duplicated work, wasted time and rework.  

Inconsistent or poor communication breeds disengagement, as employees feel undervalued.  

Inconsistent leadership or mixed signals regarding safety protocols can result in serious safety risks or compliance issues.  

When customers receive conflicting messages about a brand, it creates cognitive dissonance, often driving them to competitors. 

Fragmented strategies and weak brand equity frequently cause companies to trade below their valuation.  

Inconsistent branding signals a lack of corporate discipline and long-term strategic direction, leading to scepticism among investors and analysts. 

Furthermore, inconsistent messaging can cause a business to be overlooked for collaborations or market expansion opportunities.  

Contradictory leadership — such as constantly shifting priorities — leads to poor decision-making, as employees become afraid to act for fear of making mistakes. 

Using metrics without being managed by them — Impact-driven leaders use metrics as guides, not crutches.  

They resist the temptation to manage by dashboard alone and instead treat metrics as starting points for inquiry.  

In this approach, management prioritises strategy over numbers, ensuring metrics are used to measure the success of a strategy, not become the strategy itself.  

There are situations where data reveals skill-set deficiencies, prompting management to recommend development and training for human capital, while strategies are put in place to avoid work disruptions. 

For metrics to provide relevant information, they must reflect real market conditions; if the market changes, the metrics should shift accordingly. 

The Leadership Multiplier — Leadership behaviour scales 

One leader’s trade-off becomes a thousand daily decisions downstream.  

When leaders consistently model impact-driven behaviour, they create clarity, confidence, and alignment across the enterprise.  

This approach amplifies the team’s intelligence, skills, and capabilities, making everyone smarter and more effective.  

Such leaders facilitate vigorous debate to enable better decision-making, rather than simply commanding people what to do.  

A leader who adopts this approach might delegate a complex task to team members with the belief that, through collaboration, it will be accomplished. 

Leaders who consciously align their decisions with purpose, ethics, and long-term value are shaping organisations that can endure uncertainty, while earning trust and respect.  

Their influence extends far beyond balance sheets, leaving a lasting imprint on their people. Leaders who choose impact will lead more effectively and truly define what meaningful success looks like. 

Related Topics